CUSTOMER-CONTROLLED · READ-ONLY

Detect programme risk before the review.

Qeino connects planning, code, test and authorised team signals. It shows the evidence, owner and time left to act inside your deployment boundary.

One programme. Twelve weeks. A written go or no-go decision.

The decision windowThe reported plan stays level until the formal review while the actual risk becomes detectable earlier. The interval between detection and surfacing is the decision window.REPORTED PLANOn track until reviewACTUAL RISKDETECTABLESURFACED AT REVIEWTHE DECISION WINDOW
Illustrative. Reported plan against actual risk; the decision window sits between when risk becomes detectable and when formal review would surface it.

01The problem

Risk forms before anyone reports it.

A dependency goes stale. Two teams repeat the same investigation. A blocker stays in a thread without reaching the programme owner. The evidence exists before the status changes.

Programme risk detected before reviewAuthorised source events feed a detected risk twenty-one days before the programme review. The interval between detection and review is the time available to act.SOURCE EVENTSDETECTED RISKPROGRAMME REVIEWJIRA-4821blocker in threadCOMMIT 9F2Cdependency stale#SILICON-BRINGUPduplicate workPR-2210review stalledJIRA-4876same risk raised againDETECTED · T−21D21 DAYS TO ACTT−0

Illustrative. Related source events combine into one detected risk on the critical path, ahead of the next formal review.

WRONG WAY · REPORTING TOOLS
  • Show what teams recorded.
  • Depend on maintained status.
  • Explain what is already known.
RIGHT WAY · QEINO
  • Connects related source events.
  • Flags a forming risk.
  • Shows the reasoning and next decision.
Section01 · The problem

02How it works

Evidence in. Decision out.

Related events become one reviewable finding. Your team keeps control of the sources, reasoning and decision.

Section02 · How it works
Evidence in. Decision out.Authorised source events (Jira, GitHub, Azure DevOps, Slack) enter the customer perimeter and pass through five stages — connect, baseline, detect, review, record — producing a decision beside the evidence.AUTHORISED SOURCESJiraREAD-ONLYGitHubREAD-ONLYAzure DevOpsREAD-ONLYSlackREAD-ONLYYOUR PERIMETERCONNECT01Authorised fieldsBASELINE02Expected movementDETECT03Reviewable findingREVIEW04Human decisionRECORD05Evidence + decision
  1. STAGE 01

    Connect

    Authorise read-only access to selected Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub and Slack fields.

  2. STAGE 02

    Baseline

    Validate how the programme normally moves.

  3. STAGE 03

    Detect

    See divergence on the critical path with source events attached.

  4. STAGE 04

    Review

    A person accepts, challenges or rejects the finding.

  5. STAGE 05

    Record

    Keep the decision beside the evidence that informed it.

Illustrative decision record. Systems of record remain unchanged.

Open the source trail

03Deployment

Your boundary remains the boundary.

Qeino runs under customer identity controls and reads only agreed sources. Systems of record remain in place.

  • On-premises on customer infrastructure.
  • Read-only by default.
  • Customer-controlled identity and access.
  • Air-gapped path subject to technical confirmation.

Deployment options are confirmed against the customer environment before the pilot.

Review deployment

Qeino runs inside the customer boundaryQeino runs on customer infrastructure under customer identity and access controls. Authorised sources feed Qeino read-only. Systems of record remain in place. An air-gap option is shown as a separate inset, subject to technical confirmation.CUSTOMER INFRASTRUCTURECUSTOMER IDENTITY & ACCESS CONTROLAUTHORISED SOURCESJira · GitHubAzure DevOps · SlackQEINOOn customer infrastructureRead-only by defaultCustomer-controlled accessREAD-ONLYSYSTEMS OF RECORDRemain in placeUnchanged by QeinoNO EXTERNAL DATA PATH · PRIVATE DEPLOYMENTAIR-GAP OPTIONSigned source drops in. Signed evidence bundle out.Subject to technical confirmation.
Section03 · Deployment

04Who it is for

For programmes where a late surprise is expensive.

FOR

  • Several teams or sites share one delivery date.
  • Evidence is split across planning, code, tests and conversations.
  • Engineering data cannot enter a vendor cloud.
  • A named leader owns the milestone result.
  • Teams of 30–200 are typical; smaller deep-tech programmes with similar complexity may qualify.

NOT FOR

  • Individual performance monitoring.
  • Replacing Jira, source control or programme ownership.

Check the pilot fit

Section04 · Who it is for

05NEXT STEP

Test Qeino on one programme.

Twelve weeks. Read-only sources. Agreed evidence. A written go or no-go decision.

Twelve-week pilot traceThe pilot starts on day zero, the first signal typically appears around day fourteen, and a written go or no-go decision is recorded at week twelve.D0Kick-off~D14First signalW12Decision in writing
Illustrative pilot cadence.