PLATFORM
See how Qeino reaches a finding.
Qeino connects authorised source events to the live critical path. Every finding shows its evidence, reasoning, owner and next decision.
Your tools stay in place. Qeino reads agreed fields and does not score developers.
03Mechanism
Read. Baseline. Detect. Review. Record.
Five stages, one narrative. The spine on the left holds them together; the copy on the right narrates each one.
01 · Read
Read agreed fields from authorised systems.
Qeino connects read-only to Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub and Slack. Access is agreed system by system and field by field.
02 · Baseline
Build a programme pattern your team validates.
Qeino builds a delivery baseline against your own history. Once agreed, the baseline is locked so later comparisons stay honest.
03 · Detect
Flag divergence on the critical path.
Qeino watches the live critical path for the risk that is starting to form, and surfaces it with the evidence attached.
04 · Review
A person accepts, challenges or rejects the finding.
Every finding goes to a human reviewer with its evidence, reasoning and an alternative explanation.
05 · Record
Keep the decision beside its evidence.
Each decision is recorded against the source events that produced the finding.
ILLUSTRATIVE PRODUCT VIEW
A finding you can challenge.
See what was detected, why it matters, the source events, an alternative explanation and the next decision.
Qeino · Programme intelligence
Programme: Node-B firmware · Read-only connectors
FORMING RISK · 1
PROGRAMME
Node-B firmware
TOP FORMING RISKS
DECISION QUEUE
- FW-204R. SALMANAWAITING DECISION
- FW-198L. PETROVUNDER REVIEW
- FW-176M. HAASDECIDED · KEEP SCOPE
PROGRAMME CAPACITY · NO INDIVIDUAL SCORING
| Team | Workload concentration | Duplicate work | Unowned decisions | Evidence coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firmware | 78% | 1 signals | 2 decisions | 92% |
| Platform | 64% | 2 signals | 0 decisions | 88% |
| Silicon | 71% | 0 signals | 1 decisions | 74% |
| Tools | 42% | 0 signals | 0 decisions | 96% |
People appear only as owners or relevant prior-work context, for example “Resolved by M. Haas · Mar 2026”. Qeino does not rank or score individuals.
Qeino does not score, rank or monitor individual engineers. People appear only as owners or relevant programme context.
Across the decision chain
Programme evidence, not employee scoring.
One finding. The context each decision needs.
Qeino does not score, rank or monitor individual engineers. People appear only as owners or relevant programme context.
Qeino · One signal, five decisions
Selected risk · FW-204 · persistent
SELECTED RISK · PERSISTENT ACROSS ROLES
FW-204 · STM32 bring-up blocked on DMA driver
Qeino does not score, rank or monitor individual engineers. People appear as owners or sources of relevant context, never as ranked subjects.
Source events, reasoning and an alternative explanation.
RELEVANT PRIOR WORK
QEINO NOTE · SIMILAR WORK FOUND
FW-102 · STM32 DMA driver
Prior resolution note attached to the FW-102 pull request describes the fix for the DMA hand-off sequence and the test that guards against regression.
VIEW SOURCE · JIRA FW-102
FEEDBACK
- RatingUSEFUL · NOT USEFUL
- Further actionEngineer decides · Qeino takes none by default
- Where it appearsInline in Jira · linked from PR
FORMING BLOCKER · SOURCE TRAIL
- 12 MARJIRA · FW-204 idle 11 days · 3 dependents added
- 14 MARGIT · PR-2210 draft referencing FW-204 stalled
- 15 MARTEST · TR-088 DMA suite failing on FW-204 build
- 15 MARSLACK · blocker mentioned, no owner acknowledgement
OWNER · INTERVAL · NEXT DECISION
- OwnerR. Salman
- Critical path21 days before review
- Confidence band62%–74% · shifted −6
- Next decisionRoute to owner · request written response
PROGRAMME ATTENTION QUEUE · ORDERED BY IMPACT
| Programme | State | Change since last review | Next decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Node-B firmware | 3 forming risks | −6 confidence | Review this week |
| Edge platform | 1 duplicate investigation | unchanged | Alignment call |
| SoC validation | 1 unowned blocker | new · 6 days | Assign owner |
| Tools | no forming risks | unchanged | None |
Ordered by programme-level impact, never by person.
DEPLOYMENT BOUNDARY
- Runtime locationInside customer perimeter
- Identity controlCustomer SSO · SCIM
- Egress0 bytes to vendor cloud
- Air-gap variantConfirmed during technical review
CONNECTOR AUTHORITY
- Jira · GitHub · Azure DevOps · SlackRead-only · authorised fields
- Write authorityOff by default · explicit, narrow, revocable
- CredentialsDo not leave the deployment boundary
COUNTS · CURRENT REVIEW WINDOW
- Forming risks detected7
- Routed to owner5
- Under review2
- Decided3
DECISION HISTORY
- FW-176Decided · keep scope
- EDG-118Decided · consolidate investigation
- FW-198Under review
Counts and decisions only. Recovered value, export and any Ledger claim appear here only when the supporting capability is confirmed.
Illustrative role views. The evidence stays fixed; the decision context changes.
PROGRAMME DETAIL · ILLUSTRATIVE
Open the source trail.
Follow one forming risk from the critical path to the events behind it, then see what the owner must decide.
Programme detail · Node-B firmware
Gate 1 · 8 April
CRITICAL-PATH EFFECT
Three dependent work items now rely on the stalled driver.
FINDING
Human review: Accept · Challenge · Reject. Decision state: awaiting review.
Qeino measures programme conditions, not individual performance.
04Measures
Measures agreed before the baseline.
Your team agrees the definitions, source data and review method before the pilot starts.
Time between detection and a recorded decision.
Repeated activity identified before more time is committed.
Time between a forming blocker and owner review.
Difference between the agreed forecast and delivered date.
Hours accepted by the customer as avoided or reclaimed.
No value is counted without an agreed source and customer review.
CURRENT SOURCES
Four current sources. Read-only by default.
Access is agreed by system and field. Your tools remain the systems of record.
Available
- JiraAVAILABLE NOW
- Azure DevOpsAVAILABLE NOW
- GitHubAVAILABLE NOW
- SlackAVAILABLE NOW
If the programme depends on another source, we assess it during technical review. Assessment is not a commitment to support it.
06Alternatives
What Qeino is—and is not.
- Reporting
- Keep your dashboards for recorded status. Qeino looks for related events before status changes.
- Project management
- Your planning tools remain the system of record. Qeino does not replace programme ownership.
- Coding assistants
- They support file-level work. Qeino works at programme level.
- Employee analytics
- Qeino does not score, rank or compare individual engineers.
07Next step
Test the product on your programme.
Agree the baseline, inspect the evidence and make a written decision.